[ad_1]
A range of emotions at Wednesday’s Forest Hills School Board meeting carried over into the next day. Parents, students and even just Anderson Township residents all seemingly want one thing, for minority families and students to feel safe in their community. “We need people thinking about what it’s like to be other in this community,” said Geneva Green. Parents, students and community members like her gathered at Wednesday’s school board meeting. All hoping to insight a change of heart for the “Resolution of Kindness” vote. “We are taking away opportunities potentially. How are you going to have AP courses if you can’t talk about things like the Dustbowl because that’s socioeconomic and it’s controversial? You can’t teach Juneteenth when you can’t talk about why there is a Juneteenth.” said Natalie Hastings, a concerned parent. School board member Leslie Rasmussen says the proposal is sloppy and vague which leaves the door open for anything, “We won’t even be able to discuss the fact that women make less than men. Proven fact but guess what that’s controversial,” she said. Many parents were outraged at the 2-3 vote to ban the teachings of topics related to race, identity and critical race theory. “We’ve put our teachers in a position of having to make a decision that is outside of educating our kids,” said Antonio Ciolino, another upset parent. But today parents and students continued to make their voices heard, protesting outside of the Forest Hills Central Office. Students realize what this will mean for their confidence in their teachers. “They’re wonderful people but now they have to stay quiet because we want to be ignorant. Like I was saying this is not a community of kindness but a community of ignorance, it’s disgusting and we need to do something about it,” said Anderson senior Audrey Sacks.A select group of community members was invited to participate in the interviewing process for the possible new superintendent. One parent breathed a sigh of relief as she received answers to her most unanswered questions. “Could this verbiage cause our AP board to lose our license with the college board and really how can we move forward and keep a really good culture and community for our families of diverse backgrounds? I feel like those questions were answered,” said Lindy DeMaria.While others like Andrea Granieri were pleased with yesterday’s decision for a different reason, “I think it’s important for either candidate who comes in as superintendent to have a really clear understanding of the divisiveness that’s happening in our community right now.”One candidate who was supposed to interview for the spot of superintendent was Russ Fussnecker, the superintendent of Edgewood Schools. He declined by sending a letter to the Forest Hills Schoolboard saying his leadership lifestyle would not take Forest Hills in the direction they appear to be going.
A range of emotions at Wednesday’s Forest Hills School Board meeting carried over into the next day. Parents, students and even just Anderson Township residents all seemingly want one thing, for minority families and students to feel safe in their community.
“We need people thinking about what it’s like to be other in this community,” said Geneva Green. Parents, students and community members like her gathered at Wednesday’s school board meeting. All hoping to insight a change of heart for the “Resolution of Kindness” vote.
“We are taking away opportunities potentially. How are you going to have AP courses if you can’t talk about things like the Dustbowl because that’s socioeconomic and it’s controversial? You can’t teach Juneteenth when you can’t talk about why there is a Juneteenth.” said Natalie Hastings, a concerned parent.
School board member Leslie Rasmussen says the proposal is sloppy and vague which leaves the door open for anything, “We won’t even be able to discuss the fact that women make less than men. Proven fact but guess what that’s controversial,” she said.
Many parents were outraged at the 2-3 vote to ban the teachings of topics related to race, identity and critical race theory.
“We’ve put our teachers in a position of having to make a decision that is outside of educating our kids,” said Antonio Ciolino, another upset parent.
But today parents and students continued to make their voices heard, protesting outside of the Forest Hills Central Office. Students realize what this will mean for their confidence in their teachers.
“They’re wonderful people but now they have to stay quiet because we want to be ignorant. Like I was saying this is not a community of kindness but a community of ignorance, it’s disgusting and we need to do something about it,” said Anderson senior Audrey Sacks.
A select group of community members was invited to participate in the interviewing process for the possible new superintendent. One parent breathed a sigh of relief as she received answers to her most unanswered questions.
“Could this verbiage cause our AP board to lose our license with the college board and really how can we move forward and keep a really good culture and community for our families of diverse backgrounds? I feel like those questions were answered,” said Lindy DeMaria.
While others like Andrea Granieri were pleased with yesterday’s decision for a different reason,
“I think it’s important for either candidate who comes in as superintendent to have a really clear understanding of the divisiveness that’s happening in our community right now.”
One candidate who was supposed to interview for the spot of superintendent was Russ Fussnecker, the superintendent of Edgewood Schools. He declined by sending a letter to the Forest Hills Schoolboard saying his leadership lifestyle would not take Forest Hills in the direction they appear to be going.
[ad_2]
Source link