The Arizona election has become a global laughingstock, with an election stretching more than a month from mailing the early mail-in ballots on October 9 to continuing counting the ballots on November 13 and still quite a good number of ballots uncounted statewide.
Since a simple “one day, voter ID, paper ballot, hand count election” is not there, how can this election win the trust of the voters? Why is it designed so complicated with unlimited loopholes and time for committing possible election fraud?
There are more questions that will bring more doubts to this complicated election system. When I look at the “Tabulation Questions” on the page of Maricopa County Election Results (https://elections.maricopa.gov/results-and-data/election-results.htm#ElectionResultsSearch), I have more questions to cast doubt on its trustworthiness.
On its security measures, “Restricted access – Access is restricted to those with a job responsibility or direct oversight of tabulation.” How can we trust those people when the integrity of the election is under fire? With or without partisan backgrounds, they are election workers whose work ethics might be compromised for their respective party preferences. They are the ones, one or two, not all, if behaving Trojans that can help steal the elections from within. Catch me if you can. We can’t, as they are shielded from “restricted access” like the cat can’t touch the rat in the protected cage.
Then, let’s look at “Political Party Oversight – During tabulation, party representatives and observers are present, providing oversight.” They are “caged” with very limited chances to catch the fraud, not to mention that “party representatives and observers” can be compromised as well due to inexperienced or fake partisan backgrounds.
Onto “No Internet Connection,” the more it tries hard to be high technology, the more possible it creates a back door for election fraud. The question is always whether the programming lines have been audited and the hardware parts are fully understood and checked. No matter how perfect the other security measures you install to protect the election from being stolen, the counting machines will be programmed to change the results according to certain tasks that can be triggered, pretending to be “routed directly to a secure server.” The computer experts know how ridiculous it is. The machines behave exactly like modern Trojans.
You don’t have to install Trojans on all the machines. You just need one or two of those machines that are enough to change the election outcomes. You don’t need to steal every seat, but one or two seats of most importance.
Once the election system has lost its trust, don’t accuse me of having conspiracy theories. No, I don’t. I have reasonable doubts. What matters is you just lose my trust when you run a system with so many opportunities (loopholes) to steal the elections even if you try very hard to use “Two certified Voting System Testing Laboratories.”
They can be like professional magicians: “Before and after every election, accuracy tests are completed to verify that the ballot counting equipment was programmed correctly and counts ballots accurately.” You can print the accurate results and you can switch votes at will only when it receives commands internally pre-programmed.
Now, the skepticism has to be on everything with this ridiculous election system.
For example, signature verification can be very easily compromised as well with human eyes and partisan preferences. The more steps in the election system, the more loopholes for stealing the election.
But, a big loophole is still left wide open for “mass fraud” and it is voter ID. It’s common sense that thieves are often afraid of being checked for ID.
Herein, the Democratic Party has to be called out for its resistance to enforcing voter ID by making a racist excuse of voter suppression to belittle the minority voters not being able to have an ID. Obviously, Democrat thieves need to hide behind the minority voters as protection, like terrorists hiding behind children and women.
Without voter ID, the ballots can be collected from illegal voters, fake voters and dead voters, and voters who moved out of the state in the database. Without voter ID, you can buy a group of voters to “vote early and vote often” to drop off the fake mail-in ballots on a daily basis at different voter centers.
Is this election fair, if it is dotted with these ballots? Not to mention that the voting machines can change the numbers with a back door if necessary.
Therefore, you may count the ballots right on the machines. No matter how many times you count the ballots with an accurate number, it is still an election, rigged!
No matter how you want to solve the election problems, the simple, effective, safe and easy method “one day, voter ID, paper ballot, hand count election” is the only solution. If you have questions on it, please ask how Taiwan can do it: voting centers open at 8 AM, close at 4 PM, and the results are announced by 8-9 PM on January 13, 2024, from Election Guide with a larger voter number than Arizona –Taiwanese Presidency election: Votes 14,048,310. Registered 19,548,531. Turnout 71.86 ( https://www.electionguide.org/countries/id/209/) and simple rules of election–Characteristics of Taiwan Elections (https://web.cec.gov.tw/english/cms/ctw).
When the legacy media outlets keep their mouthpieces wide open to make claims that there is no mass or baseless fraud in the election, we know they are bought and controlled, losing the impartial surveillance function to cripple their journalist ethics. Although 0.5-1% is a very small number, it is mass enough to change the election results. As a legitimate voter, I can’t trust this complicated election system, full of loopholes for fraud.
